To: electionsbc!gems3.gov.bc.ca,AGrefinfo*gems1.gov.bc.ca,electionsbc$elections.bc.ca,gordon.campbell.mla#leg.bc.ca,premier$gov.bc.ca,rich.coleman.mla$leg.bc.ca,geoff.plant.mla^leg.bc.ca,Minister Of Opposition Subject: [EBC-MoAG-MRfTN] Public Statement; IV-13-(20)05; "On Tuesday, May 17th, you decide." -- AG/EBC Cc: info#bccla.org,Mayor and Council ,Mayor and Council Bcc: Many [Non-Styled E-Mail Preferred Especially @ my iready.ca boxes I have that filter much of the tags at the server.] c/o Buday Properties (Sometimes 000000666 BC Ltd. Political Action Committee) -- [..]. [Pending, means that the candidate can not claim official ballot access, only an exploritory intent. Includes incumbents.] [Warning, sense of humor recomended.] AG/EBC/MRfTN Public Statement; IV-13-(20)05; "On Tuesday, May 17th, you decide." -- AG/EBC http://www.elections.bc.ca/ http://www.gov.bc.ca/ (referendum_info/) http://www.citizensassembly.com/ AG, EBC, and the rest, I appauled at the imballanced propaganda towards the STV sent out "officially" by the office of the Attourney General, but yet having the Nazi Flag colors of the "so-called impartial" Elections BC Logo all over it? It reads like BS from the very begginning. I also find it outrageous that I have yet to get a response about getting a ballot or info on whether or not the ballots will be separated so I don't have to waste my time on a rabble vote, a tyrranny of the majority, like a Referendum; hey to those Pro-Referendum individuals where was the referendum to have referendums in the system? It wasn't even a Liberal Election issue. I asked Elections BC for a separate ballot with no referendum and they haven't even told me if it was possible. I vote against candidates who I disagree with, I don't need to go through this crap again, and who elected this pseudo-continental congress anyway? Citizen's Assembly, huh!, it's name sounds a bit red to me. Now back to the impartiality, why are there no cons listed, why all the positive spin for the STV/Preferential Balloting System? Everything is bound to have a down side to someone. For instance what about the fact more pragmatists and lazy thinkers, or political cowards will vote? What about the fact that the overly expensive cost to run a campaign from a Auditor to an excessive filing fee and the time for 23 more signatures than should be needed will still keep people, especially better candidates and independent ones, as well, out. How about the fact it's also seemingly proportional on a regional scale killing off the local representative for good as in a negative spin? In fact why did the government decide to spend taxes on a promotion of a system not all tax payers will be voting for or supporting. It may not be a religion but it is a creed. Will I get a write-in vote opportunity in any new system? No! Not with STV. Will I be able to pick Zero or Not Applicable to rule out all and vote my distaste for the tastless crap the elitist system has provided? No! Will a N/A or 0 count? No! Why is all this left out. Why should anyone trust a government elected through an elitist system not to choose an non-elected assembly that isn't elitist? Why should we trust an electorate who can't decide on one candidate to vote for a decisive candidate who can make a decision on an issue, it looks like it's a problem now to be worsened, that is if elections aren't being fixed, like John Paul the Second was quoted in saying, "If it doesn't happened in the media, it doesn't happen at all," suggesting that it could happen as a good or bad thing, the political elites pick the results and their media announces it without question. I imagine with a new found regional system, a popular vote, and the vast province wide referendum would be an easier fix (this purely suspicion, but reasonable). 52.67 or 53 Ridings is 2/3s of the BC Ridings; yet 48 require only 50% and a 60% province wide vote is only required for such a change that 79 individuals in the Legislature can't seem to make. Frankly I would prefer this be non-binding at the very least as a test. Give the issue more thought. No matter whether it's yes or no, the system will still have way too politically elitist standards to even begin to open doors for some real philosophical out-of-the-box thinking candidates. Thanks for taking the time to read this, and I recomend a neutral stand on future votes from government offices. This is what they call in law as poisoning the jury pool isn't it Coleman? Best Regards, X-InfoTab Gölök Zoltán Leenderdt Franco Buday The Voltairian News Service/Wire & TMET Aka The Pyromaniac of Madison County/Absent Mind. Freelance Writer [The Absent Mind]; Humorist; Mental Patient; Philotician; Police Brutality Victim Vancouver, BC (Neo Sumer) USA Winner of the GZLFB 2005 Existntial Nomination For Mayor. Just not signed up yet. [..] http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&domains=http://www.myegotimes.com/&q=%22Gölök+Zoltán+Leenderdt+Franco+Buday%22&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&domains=http://www.myegotimes.com/&q=%22Gölök+Z.L.F+Buday%22&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&domains=http://www.myegotimes.com/&q=%22Gölök+Buday%22&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&domains=http://www.myegotimes.com/&q=%22Gölök%22&btnG=Search http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq="Gölök+Zoltán+Leenderdt+Franco+Buday"&safe=images&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=50&hl=en http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq="Gölök+Z.+L.+F.+Buday"&safe=images&&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=50&hl=en http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq="Gölök+Buday"&safe=images&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=50&hl=en http://groups.google.com/groups?as_epq="Gölök"&safe=images&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=50&hl=en http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q="LIBERPHRENIA"&safe=images&as_scoring=d&lr=&num=50&hl=en News and Political Links: http://www.myegotimes.com/Vancouver.Elections/Shared/Links/ Political Egotist is a Former, As Listed Publically, Miserable Failure of A Mayoral Candidate in Vancouver who ran on a Independent but a, ignored, rather Libertarian Platform; Gölök Z.L.F Buday (96), Gölök (B.J.) Buday (02): BJ = Black Jester _____________________________________________________________________ Political Egotist, is just a parody of those who think they are so special for running for office, or an organization or winning office that they should have a title under their name as if they are better then anyone else writing to the editor or holding an opinion. _____________________________________________________________________ X-Links [..]