From: eccliesiastes2010@yahoo.com (eccliesiastes-JamesRose) Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol Subject: Re: Radio-Computer Interfacing-MC Dog Date: 14 Oct 2002 18:25:45 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 302 Message-ID: <10ac1ac7.0210141725.52db77fe@posting.google.com> References: <10ac1ac7.0210052337.2b18e11b@posting.google.com> <10ac1ac7.0210060931.54aefdde@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.3.199.20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1034645145 5090 127.0.0.1 (15 Oct 2002 01:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2002 01:25:45 GMT Path: rsl2.rslnet.net!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail Xref: rsl2.rslnet.net alt.mindcontrol:3397 B K Bugelski, An Introduction to Psychology,1973 Emotional Activation, pages 436-442 http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emoactiv.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emoactiv1.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emo.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emoactiv40.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emo2.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/emo3.html Related materials Emotional Heightening of Perception http://forum.onecenter.com/cgi-bin/forum/forum.cgi?c=msg&fid=ecclies&mid=220 Gene May Bias Amydala to Frightful Faces (what of sex, anger, emotional faces hidden in gestalt art?) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/07/020722073438.htm Photos of gestalt art on homes Chandler Az http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/Untitled5.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/coloinsidewalls.html http://eccliesiastes.homestead.com/so551.html William James, Hypnotism,1890 Ecclesiastes :: The Segregated Fields :: "Hypnotism"Hyperaesthesias"William James"Principles of Psychology"(1890)[--> see Ideo-motor action --> & Hypnopaedia ] We know what it is to get out of bed on a cold morning in a room without a fire, and how the very vital principle within us protests against the ordeal. Probably most persons have lain on certain mornings for an hour at a time unable to brace themselves to the resolve. We think how late we shall be, how the duties of the day will suffer; we say, "I 'must' get up, this is ignominious," etc.; but still the warm couch feels too delicious, the cold outside too cruel, and resolution faints away postpones itself again and again just as it seemed on the verge of bursting the resistance and passing over into the decisive act. [ this is a layout for the hypnopaedic hypothetical constructs-linguistic fictions-verbal story lines-scenarios-characterizations pertaining to the hypnotic control over sensation as pain and pleasure to which are utilized to influence-push and or inhibit motor actions-mental to physical, rapid heartrate=headache=desire to feel good=motivate action-verbal cue-concept=do-dont do=feel better; vivid dreams-mental holography-hallucination conditioning; insert behavior(s) and predispositions to or away from action, likes-dislikes-habituates into cell assemblies-behavioral engineering scripts ] If I may generalize my own experience, we more often than not get up without any struggle or decision at all. We suddenly find that we have got up. A fortunate lapse of consciousness occurs; we forget the warmth and the cold; we fall into some revery connected with the day's life, in the course of which the 'idea' flashes across us, "Hello, I 'must' lay her no longer!'--an idea which at that lucky instant awakens no contradictory or paralyzing suggestions, and "consequently produces immediately its appropriate motor effects." [verbal arrangements-serial ordered sequences-voice operant hypnotist soundbites-surrogate humunculous] It was our accute consciousness of both the warmth and the cold during the period of struggle, which paralyzed our activity then kept our 'idea' of rising in the condition of 'wish' and not 'will.' The moment these inhibitory 'ideas' ceased, the original 'idea' exerted its effects. [ artificial series arrangements as constant substitute stimuli, repetitions and rotations shaping toward specified behaviors-actions ] This case seems to me to contain in miniature form the data for an entire psychology of volition. It was in fact through meditating on the phenomenon in my own person that I first became convinced of the truth of the doctrine which these pages represent, and which I need here illustrate by no farther examples.{ Professor A. Bain (The Senses and the Intellect, pp. 336-48) and Dr. W. B. Carpenter (Mental Physiology, chapter VI) give examples in abundance. } The reason why that doctrine is not the self-evident truth is that we have so many 'ideas' which 'do not' result in action. But it will be seen that in every such case, without exception, that is because other 'ideas' simultaneously present rob them of their 'impulsive' power. But even here, and when a movement is inhibited from 'completely' taking place by contrary 'ideas,' it will 'incipiently' take place. To quote Lotze once more : The spectator accompanies the throwing of a billiard-ball, or the thrust of the swordsman, with the slight movements of his arm; the untaught narrator tells his story with many gesticulations; the reader while absorbed in the perusal of a battle-scene feels a slight tension run through his muscular system, 'keeping time as it were with the actions' he is reading (hearing) of . "These results become the more marked the more we are absorbed in thinking of the movements which suggest them;" [hypnopaedia] they grow fainter exactly in proportion as a complex consciousness, under the dominion of a crowd of other representations, withstands the passing over of mental contemplation into outward action. The "willing game,"the exhibitions of so called "mind reading," or more properly muscle-reading, which have lately grown so fashionable, are based on this "incipient obedience of muscular contraction to idea," even when the deliberate intention is that no contraction shall occur." { For a full account by an expert, of the "willing game," see Mr. Stuart Cumberland's article, "A Thought-reader's Experiences," in the Nineteenth Century, XX, p. 867. M. Gley has given a good example of ideo-motor action in the Bulletins de la societe de psychologie physiologique for 1889. Tell a person to think intently of a certain name [repetative rotations verbal arrangements-schedules of reinforcement-2ndary counter conflict approach avoidance gradients reinforcers,] and saying that you will then force her to write it, let her hold a pencil, and do yourself hold her hand. She will then probably trace the name involuntarily, believing that you are forcing her to do it. } [ouji board] "We may then lay it down for certain that every representation of a movement awakens in some degree the actual movement which is its object; and awakens it in a maximum degree whenever it is not kept from so doing by an antagonistic representation present simultaneously to the mind." Hyperaesthesia of the senses is as common a symptom as anaesthesia. On the skin two points can be discriminated at less than the normal distance. The sense of touch is so delicate that ( as M. Delboeuf informs me ) a subject after simply poising on her finger-tips a blank card drawn from a pack of similar ones can pick it out from the pack again by it's "weight." We approach here the line where, to many persons, it seems as if something more than the ordinary senses, however sharpened, were required in explanation. I have seen a coin from the operator's pocket repeatedly picked out by the subject from a heap of twenty others, { precautions being taken against differences of temperature and other grounds of suggestion. }, by it's greater "weight," in the subject's language. Auditory hyperaesthesia may enable a subject to hear a watch tick, or his operator speak, in a distant room.---One of the most extraordinary examples of visual hyperaesthesia is that reported by Bergson, in which a subject who seemed to be reading through the back of a book held and looked at by the operator, was really proved to be reading the image of the page reflected on the latter's cornea. The same subject was able to discriminate with the naked eye details in a microscopic preparation. Such cases of "hyperaesthesia of vision" as that reported by Taguet and Sauvaire, where subjects could see things mirrored by non-reflecting bodies, or through opaque pasteboard would seem rather to belong to "psychical research" than to the present category. The ordinary test of visual hyperacuteness in hypnotism is the favorite trick of giving a subject the hallucination of a picture on a blank sheet of card-board, and then mixing the latter with a lot of other similar sheets. The subject will always find the picture on the original sheet again, and recognize infallibly if it has been turned over, or upside down, although the bystanders have to resort to artifice to identify it again. [ Gestalt art-stereo images-Ecclesiastes(maybe it would assist some of you reading to think-concieve the movie to do with housewives being robotized, Stepford Wives; remember my entry on pointing out these images to people, and they are able to discern them, but afterward, a day-week, they are unable to see them-again, until I point them out-again ] The subject notes the peculiarities on the card, too small for waking observation to detect. { It should be said, however, that the bystander's ability to discriminate unmarked cards and sheets of paper from each other is much greater than one would naturally suppose. } If it be said that the spectators guide him by their manner, their breathing, etc., that is only another proof of his hyperaesthesia; for he undoubtedly 'is' conscious of subtler personal indications ( of his operator's mental states especially ) than he could notice in his waking state. Examples of this are found in the so-called "magnetic rapport." This is a name for the fact that in deep trance, or in lighter trance whenever the suggestion is made, the subject is deaf and blind to everyone but the operator or those spectators to whom the latter expressly awakens his senses. The most violent appeals from anyone else are for him as if nonexistent, whilst he obeys the faintest signals on the part of his hypnotizer. [ radio computer interfacing at a distance-windows media player-CD Burner-voice changer-surrogate humunculous-character voices-background noises-"I thought I heard ___" sleeping-waking-hypnopaedia-hypnosis-neurostimulator pairing to heartrate and neuronal activation-excitation-increased excitment and intensity, brainwaves] If in catalepsy, his limbs will retain their attitude only when the operator moves them; when others move them they fall down, etc. A more remarkable fact still is that the patient will often answer anyone whom his operator touches, or at whom he even points his finger, in however concealed a manner. All of which is rationally explicable by expectation and suggestion, if only it be farhter admitted that his senses are accutely sharpened for all the operator's movements. { ** I must repeat, however, that we are on the verge of pssibly unknown forces and modes of communication. Hypnotization at a distance, with no grounds for expectation on the subject's part that it was to be tried, seems pretty well established in certain very rare cases. See in general, for information on these matters, the Proceedings of the Society for Psych. Research, passim. **} [ and this was 1890 ] He often shows great anxiety and restlessness if the latter is out of the room. A favorite experiment of Mr. E. Gurney's was to put the subject's hands through an opaque screen, and cause the operator to point at one finger. "That" finger presently grew insensible or rigid. A bystander, pointing simultaneously at another finger, never made that insensible or rigid. Of course the elective 'rapport' with their operator had been developed in these trained subjects during the hypnotic state, but the phenomenon then occurred in some of them during the waking state, even when their consciousness was absorbed in animated conversation with a fourth party. { Here again the perception in question must take place below the threshold of ordinary consciousness, possibly in one of those split-off selves or "second " states whose existence we have so often to recognize. } [right vs left hemisphere manipulations] I confess that when I saw these experiments I was impressed with the necessity for admitting between the 'emanations' from different people differences for which have no name, and a discriminative sensibility for them of the nature of which we can form no clear conception, but which seems to be developed in certain subjects by the hypnotic trance. The egnimatic reports of the effect of magnets and metals, even if they be due, as many contend, to unintentional suggestion on the operator's part, certainly involve 'hyperaesthetic perception,' for the operator seeks as well as possible to conceal the moment when the magnet is brought into play, and yet the subject not only finds it out that moment in a way difficult to understand, but may develop effects which ( in the first instance certainly ) the operator did not expect to find. Unilateral contractures, movements, paralysis, hallucinations, etc., are made to pass to the other side of the body, hallucinations to disappear, or to change to the complementary color, suggested emotions to pass into their opposites, ect. Many Italian observations agree with the French ones, and the upshot is that if unconscious suggestion lie at the bottom of this matter, the patients show an enormously exalted power of divining what it is they are expected to do. This hyperaesthetic perception is what concerns us now. { I myself verified many of the above effects of the magnet on a blinded subject on whom I was trying them for the first time, and whom I believe to have never heard of them before. The moment, however, an opaque screen was added to the blindfolding, the effects ceased to coincide with the approximation of the magnet, so that it looks as if visual perception had been instrumental in producing them. [ view-c gestalt art along variable degree(s) of line(s),post-hypnotic suggestions to trip, entangle with, trip over, drop, pick up additional items, panic attacks, quivering muscle-tendon, contraction, jerk-twitch, stutter, itch-scratch, etc., etc. . . . ] Its 'modus' cannot yet said to be defined. ""ALL IS VANITY"" James