Lines: 206
X-Admin: news@cs.com
From: soundweapon@cs.com (Soundweapon)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.reform
Date: 10 Sep 2002 01:06:17 GMT
Organization: CompuServe (http://www.compuserve.com/)
Subject: Classified US Government Surveillance Technology Used to Spy on US Civilians
Message-ID: <20020909210617.02827.00002176@mb-cc.news.cs.com>
Path: rsl2.rslnet.net!cyclone.bc.net!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.stealth.net!news.stealth.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m1.news.cs.com!not-for-mail
Xref: rsl2.rslnet.net alt.politics.reform:17795

Classified US Government Surveillance Technology Used to Spy on US Civilians

Below is information from an anonymous source. The government has technology
that can be used to trick people into believing they are mentally ill. The
source states that government uses the technology for national security but
tests it on innocent civilians. For more information, please refer to my
website. Please post this information on other lists.


My website:
http://ourworld.cs.com/soundweapon/

Questions and Answers:

Question 1:
Who are these people? Law Enforcement - Military?
Answer:
NSA and certain branches of the FBI and CIA.

Question 2:
Who knows about these people?
Answer:
The head of the NSA and a handful of others.

Question 3:
How far does it go?
Answer:
The project was tested during the cold war, and used extensively during Desert
Storm. It is probably being used in the current war in Afghanistan and
elsewhere in the Middle East. It has also been used (for testing purposes) in
some domestic law enforcement affairs, usually without the knowledge of the
involved police departments.

Question 4:
How are they funded?
Answer:
It is funded as "Research" through the standard channels. The project is
relatively inexpensive, hence it's success and desirability to the NSA.

Question 5:
How do they obtain their restricted technology?
Answer:
The technology originally came from Dr. H. Hammelschammel, a researcher from
Monaco, in 1948, based on technology that had been developed (but never
implemented) during WWII.

Question 6:
Is HUD involved?
Answer:
No.

Question 7:
Are drug companies involved?
Answer:
No.

Question 8:
Who do they target?
Answer:
Generally people who "pose a threat" to national security, but it is often also
used on innocent victims for testing purposes. This is the part that makes me
angry.

Question 9:
Is there anyway to defeat or detect this technology that can see through walls?
Thin metals grounded to earth ground seem to block it but not 100 percent. 
Answer:
The best way to defeat the vision unit is actually a humidifier. It scrambles
the signals to the point of being useless. I have one in my home, just in case.
Even a slightly humidified room is literally impossible to penetrate. The
grounded metal idea works also, but as you said it doesn't work as well, and
it's difficult to set up.

Question 10:
A low level vacuum in a panel is enough to effectively block the sonic weapons.
I've also been exposed for long periods of time to ultrasonic weapons. Is there
a health risk from the exposure to ultrasound for such a long period of time? I
feel fine and suffer no physical damage. I suffer from sleep depravation,
though.
Answer:
And you're right about the vacuum panels, since sound cannot travel through
them. There are other ways to reduce the effects to the point where they have
no effect: carpet, "sound proof" (actually sound-deadening) walls, foam,
sweaters, blankets, anything that muffles sound. A reasonable combination of
these things will help you greatly.

As far as the testing goes, I wouldn't worry about it. They test it at levels
far lower than what they would use in the field. Sleep deprivation, depression,
anxiety, etc., are common symptoms of this low-level testing. They would never
take the risk of using it at field levels on a test subject. Also, they are
wrapping up the major studies on test subjects within the next few months, so
if you're lucky it won't go on any longer than that.

Question 11:
Is there any thing I can do to report these people?
Answer:
There's not much that you can do about reporting them, since no law enforcement
agency would be able to track them down. Your best bet is to take the
precautions I have described, and just roll with the punches to the best of
your ability. It'll be over eventually.

I sincerely believe that they're not trying to hurt you. They really are trying
to do this in the national interest, to protect the citizens. But they have to
test the effects somehow, so they do literally *thousands* of these low-level
studies, and add up the results to see what effects full-usage might have.

Question 12:
Do you know if you can detect this imaging technology that can see through
walls with any detection equipment?
Answer:
There is currently no equipment that can detect it.  Corporations, amateur
inventors, etc., haven't bothered to try for the simple reason that they don't
know that such detection equipment exists.

Question 13:
Is it Millivision (any other details if possible)?
Answer:
Oh, goodness, no.  Millivision is kid's stuff compared to what our boys use. 
I'm not quite clear on the science behind it, but basically they use a
subatomic particle generator and accelerator to "spray" a wall with particles 
(very harmless) and then use computers to identify those that bounce back based
on their signatures and patterns, and reconstruct a 3D model on the terminal. 
The particles (neutrinos, I believe) are so small that they 
can easily pass through walls, floors, etc.  The device can actually be used up
to see through 500ft of pure granite, and even that limitation isn't because of
the particles, but only because of the computer that has to 
interpret the results.

What they see, mind you, isn't photographic in the sense that a videocamera
would be.  It's a 3d reconstruction, sometimes very fuzzy, of what's going on. 
It can take months before a trained agent even really 
understands how to interpret what he's seeing on the screen.

Question 14:
How long has this testing period been going on with the American public? I've
been targeted since Sept. of 1998.
Answer:
The first public testing was probably conducted in the early 50s, and has been
happening off-and-on (as the technology evolved) ever since.

Question 15:
Is this testing occurring in other countries? I've been getting emails from
people claiming to be victims from Asian and European Countries.
Answer:
Yes, because they wanted to test the effects on people with slightly different
genetic makeups and/or body chemistry (different cultures eat differently, for
example, so they have different chemicals in their bodies).  
Interestingly, the most resistent to the effects (I participated in this
particular study) have been the Ainu from Japan.  Nobody knows why, yet.

Question 16:
Do you thinks these haunted house stories are the result of government testing
this technology on the public in the past. So much of what I've seen on TV of
people claiming to live in haunted houses seems similar to what I experiences
from the sonic weapon attacks. I remember you said this technology first
appeared during WW2.
Answer:
It's possible.  Not all of it, but I'm sure there have been some instances
where people who were particular sensitive to the effects and noticed it (such
as yourself) may have interpreted it as such.

Question 17:
Is it possible that real estate companies and/or hate groups have less advanced
versions of this technology?
Answer:
Not a chance.  The system is so complicated that I could drop 300 pages of
blueprints and explanations into the lap of a highly-qualified inventor, and he
wouldn't be able to do a thing with it.  Our prototypes only *barely* 
work compared to what we know they can do.  Some schmuck who wants to harass
people wouldn't go through the kind of trouble that we have.

Question 18:
Is this technology developed by the US companies or is available from foreign
companies?
Answer:
No commercial entity has access to the technology.  Only the US government has
access to it, and even that is highly restricted.  Only a handful of people
really know about it.  I'm sure you can understand that if something like this
were to be in public hands, it would certainly be used for nefarious means.

Question 19:
Do you know how portable this imaging technology is (the size of it)?
Answer:
I have one sitting on the desk next to me.  The components are all enclosed in
a trunk (for easy transportation) about four feet long and around two feet
tall.  It weighs about 300 pounds. The trunk contains a computer, a monitor,
and the actual device (as well as a lot of wires, switches, etc.)

Question 20:
Do you know the average size of the sonic weapons? I ask about size because my
neighbors seem to be able to move this technology in and out of their homes
without drawing any attention.
Answer:
It comes in the same kind of trunk as the imaging technology, so they're
probably just doing it when you don't notice, or they have it there and haven't
removed it.

Happy to help.  Again, I just want to say that nobody's out to get you, and in
fact they're doing it for your benefit (though it must not seem like it). 
National security is in everyone's best interest, so unfortunately they
sometimes have to let a few people have unpleasant experiences in order to find
out how to save millions upon millions in the future.  These devices have
probably already prevented a nuclear holocaust in the United 
States.